Solutions
Owners, consultants and lawyers all ask the same question of the same records: what happened at this site, and can we prove it? Statvis reads the whole file once and keeps the answers, cited.
Site owners & operators · oil and gas, utilities, industry
"We have hundreds of sites and the answer to every question is in a report somebody wrote years ago."
Consultants and project teams
"Every new phase starts with weeks of rereading the last team's files before we can do the actual work."
Environmental lawyers & legal teams
"Opposing counsel will follow every claim back to the record. So will the judge."
A defensible path to closure: full history, guideline screening, background versus impact and cited closure reports.
Site closure →A cited chronology and evidence trail that counsel and experts can test early.
Litigation support →Liability, key events and exceedances understood in days, with every fact cited for the data room.
Due diligence →Which source contributed what, sample by sample, built from the site's own chemistry.
Cost allocation →Fewer gaps and follow-up questions, with traceable data and clear figures.
Regulatory submissions →Sour gas plant closure · a midstream operator
Salinity fingerprinting in the site's own records showed natural background, which supported adjusting the guidelines applied to the closure.
Read the case study →Records program · a multinational energy company
In a blind test of 251 documents, Statvis made 13% fewer naming errors than people working to the same written standard.
Read the case study →Bring us one site's documents. We'll show you what's in them.