Use cases

The same record supports many decisions. Start with yours.

Closing a site, defending a claim, buying an asset, splitting a cleanup bill, answering a regulator: each starts with the same question. What happened at this site, and can we prove it? Statvis reads the whole file once, keeps every fact cited to its page, and puts the analysis each job needs on top.

Five jobs teams bring to us most often.

Owners, operators and their consultants

Site closure & reclamation certificates

A defensible path to closure: the full site history, every sample screened against the right guideline, natural background separated from impact, and closure reports cited to the page.

Alberta Tier 2 guidelines recalculated as you set site conditions
Salinity fingerprints that show what is natural background
Closure reports that update when new monitoring data arrives

Site closure →

Counsel and expert witnesses

Litigation support

A cited chronology built from decades of records, contradictions between sources surfaced, and forensic chemistry for questions of source.

Litigation support →

Buyers, sellers and transaction counsel

Due diligence

Every environmental file in a data room read and cited, so key events, exceedances and open regulator issues are clear before the deal closes.

Due diligence →

Parties sharing a site, and their experts

Cost allocation

Site history and chemical fingerprinting combined to separate sources, so the share each party carries rests on evidence.

Cost allocation →

Consultants and regulatory teams

Regulatory submissions

Traceable data, report-ready tables and figures, and cited reports that stay current, so fewer gaps reach the regulator.

Regulatory submissions →

Underneath every use case, one cited record.

Each site sits in its own vault and is never used to train AI models. People stay at the helm: every output points to its source so a qualified professional can check it.

Trust & security →